<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Search for Certainty on Omar Niorah</title><link>https://omarali.me/reading/the-search-for-certainty/</link><description>Recent content in The Search for Certainty on Omar Niorah</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 15:58:18 +0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://omarali.me/reading/the-search-for-certainty/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>In my now defunct (and hacked 😭) blog from yester-years (a wordpress</title><link>https://omarali.me/reading/the-search-for-certainty/2026-09-26-155818/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 15:58:18 +0400</pubDate><guid>https://omarali.me/reading/the-search-for-certainty/2026-09-26-155818/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my now defunct (and hacked 😭) blog from yester-years (a wordpress blog, that had a rogue plugin that .. well whatever, it&amp;rsquo;s gone), I had written about the idea of infinity. I came up with a gut intuitive idea of having a &amp;lsquo;unit infinity&amp;rsquo; (the &amp;lsquo;smallest&amp;rsquo; infinity) and then having multiple other infinities that can be measured .. the &amp;lsquo;bigger infinities&amp;rsquo;. Anyway, only later when I began reading this book, did I realize, Cantor came up with a better way to think of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>